Experts and nature groups raised questions about the rigour of the environmental study, pointing to how the report’s conclusion on impact to corals was based not on field surveys, but from a study that could now be outdated.
Ms Rachael Goh, co-lead of land use planning at environmental group LepakInSG, pointed out that the coral community composition could have changed over the past 14 years. “While the Helios Secondary Reef is located far away from the canal outlet, corals could have established on the sea walls nearer to the outlet. The thing is, we wouldn’t know for certain because no surveys were conducted.”
Research fellow Lionel Ng from the NUS Tropical Marine Science Institute said “many things have happened between 2012 and 2025 – including two major coral bleaching events in 2016 and 2024 – and a few minor ones, as well as other marine impacts that may not have been as well documented”, and these events could have resulted in a reef environment that is different from what was reported in the 2012 report.
Nature experts say they have not properly surveyed Jurong Island’s vegetated areas because of restrictions there. Mr Muhammad Nasry Abdul Nasir, executive director of the environmental group Singapore Youth Voices for Biodiversity, noted that the trees would help to lower temperatures on the industrial island. There could also be more bird crashes with buildings replacing vegetation, he added.